Many automakers are seeking ways to reduce the weight of cars to help them run more efficiently, according to a recent article by the Detroit Free Press*. These changes are being implemented because of the tougher fuel economy standards that the industry is applying.
The new standards required by the federal government under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy regulations will call for automakers to reach an average of 34.1 mpg for all vehicles they manufacture. This would be an increase from the 27.5 mpg previously required for cars and 23.5 mpg required for light trucks.
The new standards create a challenge for automakers and may change some consumers’ decisions on car buying.
Engineering for lighter weight options
Michael Arbaugh, chief designer for Ford interiors, suggests that the elimination of CD players would help to decrease average car weights by about 5 pounds adding to fuel efficiency.
“That’s oceanfront property when you are talking about the center stack,” states Arbaugh.
Robert Boniface, director of design for Cadillac interiors, suggests use of a lighter carbon fiber for auto construction.
“As a design element, carbon fiber is a beautiful material,” Boniface told the paper. “It’s lightweight, it is structurally sound—we like it.”
Boniface also favors carbon fiber because of its cost efficiency. He feels the cost of carbon fiber will likely continue decreasing as well as it is demanded in greater quantities and more automakers develop partnerships for industry supply at high volumes.
Safety may be at risk
The new auto standards are not expected to change car prices dramatically, but many speculators worry that the new lighter weight options could add greater safety risks.
Many feel that the lighter weight and increased fuel efficiency of these new cars will increase traffic fatalities. Smaller lightweight vehicles are at greater risk of damages in an accident and the new standards may increase damages to lightweight cars.
Rebuttals to this include the fact that lighter weight vehicles can change direction quicker and avoid accidents, but the results of the new standards have yet to take effect on the roads.
*according to the Detroit Free Press on May 11, 2012
via Peter Montanez
Recent PostsPopular Posts
- Small Businesses to Commercial Insurers: ‘You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling’ August 11, 2014 0 comments
- Salmonella Testing Not Required by Food Safety Law, Georgia Jurors Told August 11, 2014 0 comments
- Food Company Wins Religious Exemption from Contraception Benefit August 11, 2014 0 comments
- West Virginia Seeks $1.8M from Bankrupt Freedom Industries for Spill August 11, 2014 0 comments
- Who’s Worth What in the Independent Agency System? Find Out Now January 22, 2013 0 comments
- S&P: Low Interest Rates, Regulation Issues Are Key Insurance Industry Risks January 23, 2013 0 comments
- Securities Fraud Class Actions Declined in 2012 January 23, 2013 0 comments
- Supreme Court Won’t Hear Retaliation Case Against Sears January 23, 2013 0 comments
- Small Businesses to Commercial Insurers: ‘You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling’
- Salmonella Testing Not Required by Food Safety Law, Georgia Jurors Told
- Food Company Wins Religious Exemption from Contraception Benefit
- West Virginia Seeks $1.8M from Bankrupt Freedom Industries for Spill
- CCRIF/Swiss Re Offer Caribbean Governments Insurance against Excess Rainfall
- Weakened Typhoon Halong Lashes Japan; 1 Dead, Dozens Hurt
- Iranian Passenger Plane Crashes Killing 48
- ABI Says Reducing Whiplash Costs Key to Lower Auto Premiums
- GM Loses Bid to Dismiss Ignition-Switch Defect Cover-Up Claim
- Drought Weakens Links in Supply Chain Metaphor